Tuesday, November 14, 2006

Regarding New Dams & Natural Climate Change.
When will Ideology revert to Common Sense?


ONLY ~1% of all Water is as both a liquid & in potable form, there NOT being any guarantee that such will fall into the "lap of Humanity". Humanity does need to show its supposed intellect & process that greater Water Mass to garner that little it does need from the Oceans (0.0014)x(10exp24) kilograms (approx.) of otherwise Saline Water.

(Slide of Surface during Last Ice Age)

HUMANITY has become used to a distribution of Water as seen over the past centuries, but this situation is the rarity, the exception of Nature. The period of the past 15,000 years is presenting the ‘melt’ of the rising Climate after a Global Glacial Event (an “Ice Age”).
SPECIES have been going extinct within these periods well before Humanity even existed in its “Modern form”, & it is entirely possible still that Humanity could suffer if Ideology is given any further treatments preferentially over known Science. Within the platformed 'greenhouse doom & woe' rhetoric there is this danger if such is continued to be heeded.
IT is that Desalination is needed to protect both the Natural Flows of Fresh Liquid Water and those others species reliant on such. Humanity can & must source such requirements form the growing Saline Waters expected for the oncoming Climate Period still within its Natural Expectations of overall behavior. Then perhaps there will not be needed action by Humanity to otherwise meddle with natural flows presented within & to Nature (in a wider sense). It is that the weather patterning alterations (linked to Surface treatment within Human activity) is being noticed & makes further Dams only expensive lobby appeasements...

Figure 1. Sea Level Rise since last "Ice Age".

Figure 2. Blocked Periods of recurring Glacial Events.
IT is that now is again ‘that time’ in this Planets “Geo-Bio History” that species have been placed under stress, with now following a ~200 Million year long Climate 'Primary Crest' behavior sequence & now being a period presenting recurring Glaciations.

NOTICE in the slide "Four Periods of Glaciation" (figure 2.) the Permian position within that previous (blocked) Period of recurring glaciations to the "Present" (far right of time line) then notice the extract quotes of readily available Science, extracted from "The Carboniferous Ice Age" (with due thanks to the authors for their wording):-
--
["Following the Carboniferous Period, the Permian Period and Triassic Period witnessed predominantly desert-like conditions, accompanied by one or more major periods of species extinctions."]
--
["Earth's atmosphere today contains about 380 ppm CO2 (0.038%). Compared to former geologic times, our present atmosphere, like the Late Carboniferous atmosphere, is CO2- impoverished! In the last 600 million years of Earth's history only the Carboniferous Period and our present age, the Quaternary Period, have witnessed CO2 levels less than 400 ppm. There has historically been much more CO2 in our atmosphere than exists today. For example, during the Jurassic Period (200 mya), average CO2 concentrations were about 1800 ppm or about 4.7 times higher than today. The highest concentrations of CO2 during all of the Paleozoic Era occurred during the Cambrian Period, nearly 7000 ppm -- about 18 times higher than today. The Carboniferous Period and the Ordovician Period were the only geological periods during the Paleozoic Era when global temperatures were as low as they are today. To the consternation of global warming proponents, the Late Ordovician Period was also an Ice Age while at the same time CO2 concentrations then were nearly 12 times higher than today-- 4400 ppm. According to greenhouse theory, Earth should have been exceedingly hot. Instead, global temperatures were no warmer than today. Clearly, other factors besides atmospheric carbon influence earth temperatures and global warming."]
--
["Basically, Earth undergoes alternating periods of ice ages and warming whenever a continuous continental landmass extends from one polar region to the other while at the same time there exists a large polar continent capable of supporting thick ice accumulations. These conditions existed 300 million years ago during the Carboniferous Period as they do for the Earth today. However for most of geologic history the distribution of the continents across the globe did not satisfy this criteria. Continental drift continually rearranges the continents, moving at rates of only a few centimeters per year. We are actually in an ice age climate today. However for the last 10,000 years or so we have enjoyed a warm but temporary interglacial vacation. We know from geological records like ocean sediments and ice cores from permanent glaciers that for at least the last 750,000 years interglacial periods happen at 100,000 year intervals, lasting about 15,000 to 20,000 years before returning to an icehouse climate. We are currently about 18,000 years into Earth's present interglacial cycle. These cycles have been occurring for at least the last 2-4 million years, although the Earth has been cooling gradually for the last 30 million years."]
--
["Today the Earth warms up and cools down in 100,000- year cycles. Geologic history reveals similar cycles were operative during the Carboniferous Period. Warming episodes caused by the periodic favorable coincidence of solar maximums and the cyclic variations of Earth's orbit around the sun are responsible for our warm but temporary interglacial vacation from the Pleistocene Ice Age, a cold period in Earth's recent past which began about 2 million years ago and ended (at least temporarily) about 10,000 years ago."]
---------------_---------------

THERE isn't going to be enough potable water overall (let alone in Australia), even if Humanities “overall Population” does shrink. Certainly there is going to be a further Natural rise is relative Sea Level, whilst naturally melting Ice will not present that melt volume into the Potable category of Liquid Water, the increase will be in Saline Water.
DESALINATION of Water in Australia is no longer disputable as an immediate necessity, needed well before Recycling (you cannot 'recycle' nothing) or any further Dams (you cannot catch what does not fall) projects are built when needed is protection against that declining overall “potable water” percentage.
  • It is that Climate Change is real & Natural, still displaying its natural progessions; the falsehoods are within the Greenhouse Rhetoric and its now “attached” lobby platforms.


Yours, Peter K Anderson (a.k.a. Hartlod™)
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com
*
http://hartlod.blogspot.com/ ** http://hartlodsgallery.blogspot.com/

4 Comments:

Blogger Peter K. Anderson said...

There is persistent mention of "Precipitation & Temperature" records when discussion of Water supply occurs.
Realise that "records" that are consistent in the "measuring" of are only barely 200 years long.

The {NORM} as expressed within 'Water' discussions is for Australia & is for this Continent without regard to {Measures taken by "MODERN" Humanity}.
All that such {Record Takings} can "tell" is that the Precipitation is MOVING.

The realisation needs to be made of the DIFFERENCE tween {Humanities production of Records} and that behavior otherwise seen over periods BEYOND the last 50, 100 or 200 years.
Notice that the Culture of the Aboriginal Peoples of this Australian Continent presented minimal Settlement.

Even when in Other "International Regions" Humanity produced a Culture around Settlement (even in close-by New Zealand), the Natural presentation of Resources within "Australia" never seems to have make such a "Cultural Decision" sufficiently viable.

This wandering of Precipitation is also WHY Catchment (of ANY style) is of limited {long term} use within the majority of regions within Australia.
Realise that by retaining precipitation from GROUND WATER then the RECHARGE rate of Natural Aquifers associated with that region most certainly will also diminish by some amount.

It is only the {Human-centric} who persist in demanding that ALL Fresh Water be "stolen" {by & for} Humanity.
Humanity can NOW produce such for its own needs, and leave those NATURAL fresh water flows to NATURE. Be it Dam or Tank, Precipitation still needs to occur IN THE RIGHT SPOT for any Catchment system to function.

Notice:-
+ Without persistent Water & Electricity there is NOT any reason to remain, so Home Prices will DECREASE.
+ Without persistent Water & Electricity to sustain both Population & the "Work Place" then Business Investment will Diminish whilst that {Commerce & Industry} already present will not remain.
+ There will not BE an "Australia" as it presently exists socio-politically. No need then will there be for Government or (especially) that Bureaucratic Infrastructure that "supports" Government processes as at present.

As I have also mentioned in other places, it is easy to store "Heated Water" & harder to "Store" Electricity.
As Population density grows the ability diminishes to generate by processes of Façade & Architectural Generation sufficient {onsite generated} Electricity to power the "recycling" processes of the scale being now mentioned.

There is less Architectural Facade Space per Individual available in denser Human Population conditions.
Thus more remote Electricity Generation is needed to PUMP Waste Water to the 'then' RELEVANT {Water Processing Utility}, needing also more separate pipe systems to be laid to/from those 'then' needed {Water Processing Utilities}.

Solar Panels on the roof of dwellings unoccupied during the Day achieve nothing, the "generation" cannot (attempted already & seen to FAIL & for known PRACTICAL reasons of Engineering & Science) be placed into the Grid.
Rooftop Water Heaters CAN however be used reliably & have been for YEARS.
Realise also that to maintain long term Health the average member of Humanity requires 3 to 4 litres of Fresh Water DAILY. The average Bucket holds ~4.5 litres, to give a visualised volume to this quantity.

There has NOT been any realistic or even {thoughtfully considered} outline to even explain why those who are Ideologically Driven find so "wrong" the Desalination Process, however what the Ideologists need to do is pick up a Calculator, rather than a Pen.
There will NOT be any Water to recycle within the "Ideological Dreams" behind presently mentioned Policy in the DECADE still needed to finish those already stated "implementations".

Even then there will NOT be a 100% "recycling service" to 100 % of the (ever growing) Population so a NETT DRAW from {Water Stores} will STILL need to be made.
There will not however BE most likely any Water available.

There is much more to be considered than Ideology...

Yours,
Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(TM)
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com
(*)- http://hartlod.blogspot.com/
(**)- http://hartlodsgallery.blogspot.com/

1:20 pm, January 05, 2007  
Blogger Peter K. Anderson said...

An outline I have previously mentioned else-where would realise Potable Water produced as a Food Product. This process would {charge itself} by an initial inflow of Ocean water into Desalination so to construct a "super" saline solution. The super saline solution made post Desalination can then be added to an inflow of Grey (potentially potable) Water as part of the {water cleaning} process. This will positively impact on microbial organisms present within such Water. There is already a large {body of work} on saline solutions in regard to Swimming Pool Water conditioning as well as from within the Food Industry.

This Salt/Grey-Water mix will then have added a component of {NEW} Ocean Water added.
This will allow a consistent Volume to be processed & thus outputted with also the further addition/replenishment of Salt.

This Mix will be passed back into the Desalination Process & the "super" saline solution will again be produced, & then channelled again into incoming Grey Water.
This process is continuous with any increase in saturation of the "super" saline solution only further enhancing the {cleaning process}.

The inclusion of a component of NEW water makes this solution more palatable to most I have mentioned this too, with also the added benefits of:-
A) Unification of Utilities (Desalination & Recycling both mooting Pressure Osmosis at present).

B) Separation of {sewerage} into a separate treatment system & otherwise a single series of Potable Water Process Utilities.

C) Simplification of piping & interconnecting infrastructure.

D) Satisfies near all proponent arguments involving {water wastage} whilst freeing of Natural Flows from the intense but near futile efforts to {retain every last drop}.

The production of Water by this method would be potentially regarded as (& thus regulated as) a FOOD PRODUCT.

There would be potentially three such Utilities (near Wollongong, Newcastle & within the Sydney Basin) where there is already adequate supply of Electricity & Infrastructure.

Water would be processed with outflow direct into supply with existing transfer systems able to be used.
These would NOT need to be on the Coast as the Saline output would not be discharged (as waste) but rather used (as an asset).

Transport of Water inland from the Northern & Southern Utilities would be by pipeline or Rail/Road Tanker for dispersal into IMPROVED landholder reservoirs.

Funding for conversion of open ditch Dams as most properties present as internal catchment into covered & sealed reservoirs would then be refilled (under meterage) facilitate the regeneration of pastoral & agronomical industries.
Instead of the buying of {Water rights} from rivers, the water would be directly purchased.

I notice already that an event I have pre-emptively mention is now seen reported as occurring.
This is as an Inter-State based battle for River Flow.

Humanity is NOT the only species that needs Fresh Water.
Humanity has NO RIGHT to regard any & all Natural Flow of Fresh water as {fair game}.
It is also that Humanity is (as far as I am aware) the only species at present able to PRODUCE as such potable water.


Your's,
Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(TM)
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com
(*)- http://hartlod.blogspot.com/
(**)- http://hartlodsgallery.blogspot.com/

6:31 pm, January 13, 2007  
Blogger Peter K. Anderson said...

An outline that I have previously mentioned here & else-where would realise Potable Water produced as a Food Product.
The super saline solution made post Desalination can then be added to an inflow of Grey (potentially potable) Water as part of the {water cleaning} process. There is already a large {body of work} on saline solutions in regard to Swimming Pool Water conditioning as well as from within the Food Industry.

Water would be processed with outflow directed into supply so that existing transfer systems are able to be used.
These utilities would NOT need to be on the Coast as the Saline output would not be discharged (as waste) but rather used (as an asset).
Transport of Water inland would be by pipeline &/or Rail/Road Tanker for dispersal into IMPROVED landholder reservoirs.

There is extensive work also on use of saline water directly for agronomical/pastoral use, with many regional settlements have smaller scale Desalination plants already in place also.
It is simply the {getting of Water} TO those utilities that needs to be considered.
These utilities otherwise process ground water at present.

From an earlier article ["It's a waste: seawater not the solution"] in the SMH a summary of previously made costings is seen:-
["A recycling scheme that produced 100 million litres of water a day would cost $285 million to build or $1.15 for every 1000 litres of water, according to a Sydney Water report dated August 17, 2005. A desalination plant capable of producing the same amount of water would cost $470 million or $1.80 per 1000 litres..."]

It is also noticed that the costings of Infrastructure to enable recycling seem not to be mentioned nor is the situation that both Desalination & Recycling are both to use a pressure osmosis process...

The other large difference is that the active production of an inflow of water is needed, as Recycling is only a remediation of Draw (i.e. use) & will not keep reservoirs actively filling.

There is also an Electricity use variation, but the direct process efficiencies to be actually used NOW are of more relevance than those of now ~12 months ago as reported near 6 months ago.

There is also mentions of {greenhouse costings} added (seen else-where). These artificial & arbitrary Ideological additions need to be removed to gain a TRUE idea of relative expenses.

None of these costings will be exceeding the overall expense of having NO WATER however...whilst the combination of both Desalination & Recycling Processes into single Utilities WILL both reduce Draw from, & produce the creation of a positive Inflow to, Water Supplies for both the Sydney Basin & (by extended implementation & use) the rest of Australia in perpetuity.
That is to say it would free this Nation & ALL its Population from the vagaries of Precipitation reliant Catchment (of any kind) based systems.

Your's,
Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(TM)
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com
(*)- http://hartlod.blogspot.com/
(**)- http://hartlodsgallery.blogspot.com/

11:32 am, January 15, 2007  
Blogger Peter K. Anderson said...

Notice the proposal I have mentioned for Pressure Osmosis processing of Ocean & Reticulated non-Sewerage Water to a (food) graded Water output.
Notice that the separate Pipe Infrastructure is already in place to rapidly implement such. Segregation of Sewerage (i.e. from the Water Closet, the W.C. or otherwise labelled {the toilet}) from other water use (e.g. shower, sink, etc.) is already made.

By diverting {storm water} (now including "non-sewerage water" from "sink & Shower") pipe to the (near coastal) Desalination & Recycling Water Processing Utility the combination with an Ocean Water Inflow WILL provide a (food product) gradable outflow of WATER within a persistent & CONSISTENT volume.

The pipe is already in place, just a few connections need to be diverted & the flow within that pipe is already moving in generally the required direction.

AS such once desalination is began the addition of the recycled input will follow rapidly & Water Issues can be remediated within a reasonable time-frame to ally those fears the Public presently have (& quite rightly hold).

Yours,
Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(TM)
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com
(*)- http://hartlod.blogspot.com/
(**)- http://hartlodsgallery.blogspot.com/

12:05 pm, January 24, 2007  

Post a Comment

<< Home