Costing Natural Change?
Humanity must adapt & move, not Audit & take ‘balances’. It isn't ‘Bankers’ that ‘We’ need nor a ‘parceling' of blame.
Humanity must adapt & move, not Audit & take ‘balances’. It isn't ‘Bankers’ that ‘We’ need nor a ‘parceling' of blame.
Realise that the greenhouse opinion platform has only ever been argued as an object of Law, Politics & Commerce. All the modern greenhouse drone perpetuates is the same LIE that supported those original drones in their POLITICAL LOBBY.
Over the past 30,000 years a land bridge joining Australia to New Guinea has come & gone, as has a land bridge joining the region of the North Eastern European & Western Region of the North American Continents (see figure 1 below). There is NOT any link of these events in greenhouse politic science-ese expressed as is seen in recent media expositions re-presenting both the sound of philosophy & the sound of the scientist that the Greenhouse Platform persistently attempts.
There is NOT any possibility that CO2 can produce a greenhouse effect with its actual properties, nor can any other material labeled with greenhouse, as that effect is outlined within the greenhouse theory (see outline To Start Discussion in link * below). There is a problem real & due to (as yet) unrestrained Human actions, the unheeded effect of the Sprawl of that Populations production of Habitat, noted within the outlines here-in on this site.
Figure 1: Notice Coast Line motion & presence of Artic & Australian Land Bridges.
There is NOT any possibility that CO2 can produce a greenhouse effect with its actual properties, nor can any other material labeled with greenhouse, as that effect is outlined within the greenhouse theory (see outline To Start Discussion in link * below). There is a problem real & due to (as yet) unrestrained Human actions, the unheeded effect of the Sprawl of that Populations production of Habitat, noted within the outlines here-in on this site.
Figure 1: Notice Coast Line motion & presence of Artic & Australian Land Bridges.
Realise that the VERTICAL rise of Relative Sea Level seen since is only a reversal of the DECLINE that preceded the previous Glaciation, situated as it is in the Trough of both Primary & Secondary Climate Oscillations. THIS is what the island states of the Pacific (as example) need to realise, their SHORT TERM residence potential formed & now is receding. Within this present period of ~30,000 years the ebbing Relative Sea Level (within the lead-in to) & NOW after that Global Glacial event the RISING Relative Sea Level will follow in a NATURAL repositioning. However the eventual HIGH WATER relative level to can be seen resultant of this REVERSION COULD be into a Primary Crest, with Climate NATURALLY leaving the Primary Trough behaviors & its presented observations.
Alternatively Climate will remain in the Primary Trough, with the Secondary Oscillation ONLY moving into a PEAK then taking overall Climate back into a Secondary Tourgh presenting again a 'Glacial Event' of some scale perhaps even clasifiable as an Ice Age. This will see a lower High Water mark with another decline into another Glacial even very likely. The situation is literally that of the tidal pool but in REVERSE.
In the dry tidal pool analogy, the fish of Humanity are not able to discern where the High Water Mark will be, yet attempt to OPINION its position only on a basis its own interests. Humanity is being the trapped fish within greenhouse hubris, standing on its rock plinth attempting to have the water part about Humanity.
At some point in time prior to the past Ice Age, the Modern conformation of Sea Level would have been also, and that conformation reprised TODAY is NOT the Peak of Relative Sea Levels. It needs to be realised, Humanity WILL need to move and greenhouse issues remediation WILL NOT prevent this needed remediation due to NATURAL Processes.
At some point in time prior to the past Ice Age, the Modern conformation of Sea Level would have been also, and that conformation reprised TODAY is NOT the Peak of Relative Sea Levels. It needs to be realised, Humanity WILL need to move and greenhouse issues remediation WILL NOT prevent this needed remediation due to NATURAL Processes.
The REALITY is that Humanity needs to notice WATER & not any more ACTORS attempting to proffer POLITICAL SUPPORT for the greenhouse wagon, even CHARLTON HESTON himself would not be able to bring about this reversion in the manner the greenhouse drone demands.
There is NOT within ANY concerns required towards the REALITIES of this situation, any relevance of 'greenhouse issues', there NOT being possible a 'greenhouse effect' within the REALITY that the System of the Environment presents.
Figure 2: Land Bridge “Ice Age” 20,000 years ago, Modern Age region view.
There is not any relevance at all to a supposed greenhouse effect in any regard to the situation Pacific Island resident Population (as example) finds itself placed within. Nor is there any regard to greenhouse emissions to the further increase in Relative Sea Levels, the NATURAL tide is returning, the ONLY question is how high & this is still NOT related to a non-existent greenhouse effect.
There is not any point attempting to recite that Australia (as example) needs to revise attitudes towards the Kyoto Protocol in regard to safeguarding such Population in present residence situations.
Figure 2: Land Bridge “Ice Age” 20,000 years ago, Modern Age region view.
There is not any relevance at all to a supposed greenhouse effect in any regard to the situation Pacific Island resident Population (as example) finds itself placed within. Nor is there any regard to greenhouse emissions to the further increase in Relative Sea Levels, the NATURAL tide is returning, the ONLY question is how high & this is still NOT related to a non-existent greenhouse effect.
There is not any point attempting to recite that Australia (as example) needs to revise attitudes towards the Kyoto Protocol in regard to safeguarding such Population in present residence situations.
There is not any reason to regard the Kyoto Protocol even able to remediate ANY existent process involving actions of Humanity. It is rather pointless attempting further justification of greenhouse opinion with any reliance on claiming existent a consensus when by its persistent mention it is shown such consensus opinion cannot exist, due the fact of the persistence of the citation effort. An existent consensus would not need to be so oft mentioned as the only remaining defense of greenhouse opinion....& policy.
There is not any tragedy attached at all in REALITY to the greenhouse opinion platform except that it still persists, whilst the complete hypocrisy seen in any effort to paint an image that the greenhouse drone is interested in anything OTHER than gaining & MAINTAINING power & position is obvious. This is as it is seen so often in the effort to produce styled discussions so only the greenhouse drone is heard, & seen to be heard in monologue as unchallenged.
The quantity of material in Climate Reports that is being sourced generally seems unending, an effort for volume to impress by the scale of the report, rather than the validity of the material contained is obvious. Quantity over Quality seems the platform position involved from beneath these supposed expert sources, the Talking Head Presenter being the figure head. Then even after report delivery there is seen the Committee questioning even the validity of its own report…but adds comment that it cannot be ignored or risk doom and climate woe.
There is not any tragedy attached at all in REALITY to the greenhouse opinion platform except that it still persists, whilst the complete hypocrisy seen in any effort to paint an image that the greenhouse drone is interested in anything OTHER than gaining & MAINTAINING power & position is obvious. This is as it is seen so often in the effort to produce styled discussions so only the greenhouse drone is heard, & seen to be heard in monologue as unchallenged.
The quantity of material in Climate Reports that is being sourced generally seems unending, an effort for volume to impress by the scale of the report, rather than the validity of the material contained is obvious. Quantity over Quality seems the platform position involved from beneath these supposed expert sources, the Talking Head Presenter being the figure head. Then even after report delivery there is seen the Committee questioning even the validity of its own report…but adds comment that it cannot be ignored or risk doom and climate woe.
Figure 3 Sea Level observed in past 300 years in 3 locations, but still part only of an ongoing process.
The tide is returning NATURALLY, why is being platformed these claims of pretenders to Charlton, all looking to take up the Rod so to move Water upon the Earth, or at least have us think they can with Media support.
An obvious truth does NOT need to be platformed as the 'greenhouse drone' requires.
Scepticism is also seen in a situation where the claimed truth is only an observed event, but the railroaded explanation is incapable of actuality or even an existence as a Process within the SYSTEM (the Environment) being observed...as exampled with the supposed greenhouse process.
There is NOT any possibility that CO2 can produce a greenhouse effect with its actual properties, nor can any other material labelled with greenhouse, as that effect is outlined within the greenhouse theory. There IS a problem real and due to (as yet) unrestrained Human actions, the unheeded effect of the Sprawl of that Populations production of Habitat & it is the Surface that is warming, not some vaguely defined global warming...move or be inundated.
An obvious truth does NOT need to be platformed as the 'greenhouse drone' requires.
Scepticism is also seen in a situation where the claimed truth is only an observed event, but the railroaded explanation is incapable of actuality or even an existence as a Process within the SYSTEM (the Environment) being observed...as exampled with the supposed greenhouse process.
There is NOT any possibility that CO2 can produce a greenhouse effect with its actual properties, nor can any other material labelled with greenhouse, as that effect is outlined within the greenhouse theory. There IS a problem real and due to (as yet) unrestrained Human actions, the unheeded effect of the Sprawl of that Populations production of Habitat & it is the Surface that is warming, not some vaguely defined global warming...move or be inundated.
posted by Peter K. Anderson at Monday, October 30, 2006
1 Comments:
Climate change is real, the LIE is in the attempt to make a greenhouse effect casual, and that supposition of an unnatural greenhouse additions are making unnatural changes to Climate.
The Climate IS Warming, it has been doing so for over 18,000 years and IS NOT going to cease so doing, & so the WORD still is ANTICIPATION.
At issue within Australia as one example, INFLOW to Catchment is in decline Nation wide. That this inflow decline is persistent & more rapid than reduction in DRAW is able to be produced by RECYCLING & other items of present policy agenda.
One only needs a calculator after all.
As such rapid increases in INFLOW are required, & this will require DESALINATION. The Natural INFLOW is in decline, in the example of the Sydney Basin Region being measured as a decline of ~3% per annum in Catchment level. At the current rate of decline, in a decade there will be not any water IN the Catchment system to recycle, for example apart from whatever remains in the PUDDLE. Pushing pipes further into the Catchment seems to be the only remediation the present Bureaucracy wants to present also; 'cheap' but not very effective if INFLOW is in decline. An empty rainwater tank is also only presenting an increase in 'catchment capacity', NOT an increase of water IN storage, so subsidy on installation of Rain water tanks presents NO increase in INFLOW or decline in DRAW.
Money does TALK, but it is not Money that is the issue. The DETAILS are important.
Notice (again) that it is the MEDIAN SURFACE TEMPERATURE that is rising, not some vague measure of a vague situation and that this is link directly to the alteration to the MEDIAN Surface Materialing produced by the Sprawl of the construction of Human Habitat. In Australia this is exasperated by the Natural surface alterations produced by the increasing drought surface situation, as is the behavior of the REMATERIALED Surface within Human Habitat.
The Sydney basin is showing this in overall alterations to precipitation over the basin and its related Catchments very clearly & obviously. It is also that the PUBLIC is becoming more generally able to interpret the REALITY about it than the MEDIA seems interested in of presenting such within the "climate frenzy".
There is after all plenty of Water, but "to-date" only 1% of such TOTAL WATER is OVERALL presented as an available liquid in a potable style. This is over the ENTIRE GLOBE, only ~1% of all liquid water is fresh and available.
HOWEVER, "to-date" has been seen within a RISE from a Major Glaciation and in the WARMING post-glaciation Climate Period the overall VOLUME Of liquid water will rise.
The proportion of such Water that is fresh will NOT. Thus the PERCENTAGE previously regarded in a rough statistic form as ~1% will DIMINISH. This is as once liquid, WATER can be seen become readily removed from the "available list", even if remaining fresh, & one simply ends up trying to "find water under every rock".
NOT a "careful policy" for remediation for a region fixed Population even of the size of those seen in Australia, let alone CHINA. The SOLUTION is simple, Desalinate Water that is otherwise readily available.
Mention of detail casues reprise in mention that it is specifically the Median Surface Temperature that is observed rising.
It is noticed also the vague approach the "greenhouse drone" presents, as if ANY notice of detail is going to be counter productive. The "Stern Report" is immediately then non-consequential, being only an effort to attach dollars to the generally disinforming global warming rhetoric seen displayed within a persistent reprise in Movie and Novel, exampled by that in-consequential Movie from Mr Gore (as example).
The Climate is Warming, it has been doing so for over 18,000 years and IS NOT going to cease doing so just as a loud but misinformed greenhouse team want everyone to play their game instead. If the greenhouse players want to find a cause notice the outlines in link ** below, and notice more what Humanity is doing to the planetary surface...find something "REAL & CONCRETE" to talk on for a "CHANGE".
That rise in Median Surface Temperature is very easily shown to be trended to production of Human Habitat & associated Surface Rematerialing.
Yours,
Peter K. Anderson a.k.a. Hartlod(TM)
E-Mail: Hartlod@bigpond.com
* http://hartlod.blogspot.com/
Post a Comment
<< Home